<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Shoreham Cricket Club</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk</link>
	<description>The website of Shoreham Village Cricket Club, Kent</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:16:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday XI v Horton Kirby II</title>
		<link>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2012/04/15/sunday-xi-v-horton-kirby-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2012/04/15/sunday-xi-v-horton-kirby-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Friendly Match Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/?p=1479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So after 7 months, the moment had finally arrived for the Sunday faithful to return to their natural habitats and normal service was resumed immediately with Captain Jack winning the toss and electing to field. Tom “Thompson Local” Palmer (6-1-17-1) and George “Norge” Rivett (8-4-6-2) opened the bowling and kept the pressure on early. It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So after 7 months, the moment had finally arrived for the Sunday faithful to return to their natural habitats and normal service was resumed immediately with Captain Jack winning the toss and electing to field. Tom “Thompson Local” Palmer (6-1-17-1) and George “Norge” Rivett (8-4-6-2) opened the bowling and kept the pressure on early. It was Thompson who made the first breakthrough with help from a lovely diving catch low to his right from Phyllis Edge at square leg. Phyllis (5-2-8-0) then duly replaced Thompson at the Pavilion End and continued to pile the pressure on Horton Kirby with impressive figures. Dan “DJ” James grasped a catch at slip off Norge’s bowling and Norge was lucky to pick up another wicket with a half tracker that didn’t bounce and slipped beneath the batsman’s swing. Danny Setterfield (4-0-27-2) worked hard at the Pavilion End and made sure he held on to a return catch to claim his first wicket. His second wicket was courtesy of a sharp stumping from Martin Wells who started the new season with yet another fantastic performance behind the stumps. Alex MazMazMazzon (5-1-15-1) was rewarded for his work at the Kissing Gate End with the scalp of Watts who was nicely caught by Captain Jack at short mid-wicket who employed an unorthodox technique to take the ball by swirling around underneath it for a while and then jumping backwards and bouncing nicely off of next week’s wicket.</p>
<p>Jackson (6-1-18-0) brought on himself and DJ (4-0-15-0) who continued to crank up the pressure as Horton Kirby struggled to get more than 3 runs an over. DJ surprised the batsmen with a couple of well timed doosras but was replaced with Krish (5-0-19-1) who took the wicket of danger man Tooney who top scored for Horton Kirby on 38. Alex “Boozy” Haysler  (1-0-6-0) finished up the innings at the Pavilion End to leave Horton Kirby on 146 for 8 after a mammoth 46 overs were bowled. A special mention should go to the team’s fielding effort which was absolutely brilliant. Four catches were taken along with Martin’s stumping and a direct hit run-out from Boozy. Horton Kirby were also forced to work really hard for every run and spirits were high in the field.</p>
<p>After a delicious tea from Nick and Sue Pearce, Boozy and “Boycott” Mazzon were given the task of opening with the target of 147. Despite the freezing conditions that would later turn to hail, they managed a solid opening partnership of 41 before Boozy departed for 19. Martin followed shortly after without scoring bringing the well warmed-up Matt “Jonty” Heathcote to the middle who had had a solid performance in the field and looked very comfortable before playing around a straight one and returning to the pavilion for 6. DJ also looked comfortable before setting off on a single with Maz who then decided he wasn’t going to make it leaving DJ stranded halfway down the wicket. Whilst departing for 5, DJ could faintly be heard saying to Maz “Mine’s a Harveys.” Tom Palmer came to the crease and customarily scored in big boundaries and again looked good before being run out for 10 with an accurate throw from deep mid wicket. Phyllis followed Thompson back into the hutch shortly afterwards without scoring which left Shoreham on 93 for 6 after 25 overs chasing 146 with Maz still in on 32. This meant Captain Jack came to the crease and, along with Mazzon, put on 27 in 5 overs including a six from Jackson that ended up on the fairway past the top boundary. However, Captain Jack then played around a straight one and departed for 15 leaving the team on 120 for 7 with 7 overs remaining. Danny Setterfield came in at number 9 and hit some very well timed boundaries to keep the run rate up but the wickets continued to fall as Boycott Mazzon had finally made his deserved fifty after 35 overs and departed only 2 balls later with a split bail for his troubles. Only 7 were needed off of the last 3 overs and they were negotiated well by Krish (4*) and Danny (15*) to bring the Sunday side their first win of the season after only one game. Danny took great joy in hitting the winning runs which was replicated with a massive cheer from the pavilion. Of course, Mr Extras helped the cause by being second top scorer with 23 but it was away to the George to tell the over exaggerated stories of the game and to taste the first jug of the season courtesy of the Maz.</p>
<p>Norge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2012/04/15/sunday-xi-v-horton-kirby-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday XI v Horton Kirby</title>
		<link>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/07/24/horton-kirby/</link>
		<comments>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/07/24/horton-kirby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 14:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Friendly Match Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/?p=1468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still seeking their first win of the season, the Shoreham XI took on the might of Horton Kirby and after a rained off match against Otford last week, everyone was keen to get a good result out of the match. After winning the toss and with a tedious inevitability, we were put in to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still seeking their first win of the season, the Shoreham XI took on the might of Horton Kirby and after a rained off match against Otford last week, everyone was keen to get a good result out of the match.</p>
<p>After winning the toss and with a tedious inevitability, we were put in to the field on a sunny but windy day. Ed (8 – 0 – 44 – 1) and Joel (4 – 0 – 39 – 0) opened with no breakthrough until Joel was replaced with Jack and Ed bowled Hildebrand for 29 with a corker. The run rate accelerated a bit for the next couple of overs until Jack caught the edge of Bennett (55) which was taken by makeshift keeper Mazzon. The team suddenly had a new-found sense of confidence and took to field with new energy, determined to convert on this promising start. After this Andre (5 – 0 – 39 – 1) came on to replace Ed and caught Overden with a double-bouncing bouncer which trapped him LBW for only 8. The next breakthrough came with Shoreham&#8217;s new addition, Krish Therli, who had claimed not to have played cricket for over three years before bowling two of Horton Kirby&#8217;s middle order in his first pair of overs before their in-form batsmen Reynolds skied one to Dan James on 61. Krish ended with figures of (5 – 0 – 22 – 3) making him the pick of the Shoreham bowlers. Other contributions came from Dan Setterfield (5 – 0 – 23 – 1), Dan James (1 – 0 – 10 – 0) and Alex Haysler who took the advice of bowling better than his last spell (1 – 0 – 23 – 0) and have an economy of less than 23. He nearly managed to cut that in half this time with figures of (2 – 0 – 26 – 0), so a big improvement for him. In the end Horton Kirby hit exactly 200 runs off their 40 overs meaning Shoreham needed just over 5 runs an over to see their first victory of the season become a reality.</p>
<p>After a quality tea from Dan James, Jack acknowledged that Shoreham needed to make a quick start in order to make a dent in the 201 runs required so sent in the in-form Ed Walker with the more experienced Bob Sims. The customary Shoreham collapse happened a bit earlier than usual this week with the first six batsmen scoring 17 runs by the bat between them. This included Dan Setterfield who was certain to hit at least 70 runs looking at his form. Unfortunately it seemed that he had got his priorities a bit wrong when his wife phoned when he was on 3 to tell him that she was having a baby and he departed to a wave applause, leaving the team in even more difficulty.</p>
<p>Then came Dan James. It&#8217;s fair to say that Dan&#8217;s batting history at Shoreham cricket club does not make for the best reading with a top score of 18 and a single figure average last year. However after a net session where he realised that the harder he hit the ball, the further it went, he decided to put all past form behind him and launch an assault on the Horton Kirby attack with Krish. However, Alex Haysler seemed to have different ideas in this match after getting only 3 runs with the bat, decided that he would do all he could to make sure that he top-scored. So after giving Bob out stumped on 3, he decided to give Krish out LBW for a duck, a definite Sunday Taboo. Andre (2) followed suit quickly leaving a dire looking 62-8 and about 25 of those came from extras. This brought Captain Jack to the crease and with this, something that will go down in Shoreham legend.</p>
<p>Dan&#8217;s first boundary came with a deft flick off his pads, clearing square leg and running down the hill for four well-deserved runs. Jack started in a much similar fashion, hitting Costen for back-to-back straight fours at the start of his over and suddenly Horton Kirby had a sense of urgency about them, realising that they had to do something so they brought back on their openers (The same openers that tore through our top order). This change had no effect on the two batsmen who took to them happily and before anyone knew it, Jack had reached his first ever 50 with Dan not far behind. After this Jack decided that he had had enough of batting so got bowled by Watts on 51, leaving Dan stranded in the middle on 46 and bringing last man Joel to the crease. Unfortunately Joel was also a bit tired so got himself out for a duck, meaning that Dan was left on 47*, let down by a team that didn&#8217;t support him. Shoreham ended on 145, 56 runs short of the win but hey, when has that mattered?</p>
<p>Man of the match is Dan James for taking a catch, making a splendid tea, scoring a magnificent 47* and quadrupling his average for the season, and being a good sport and buying a jug for 50 avoidance.</p>
<p>Maz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/07/24/horton-kirby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd XI v Withyham</title>
		<link>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/06/18/2nd-xi-v-withyham/</link>
		<comments>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/06/18/2nd-xi-v-withyham/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2nds Match Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/?p=1465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was the beginning of our chance to end the first half of the season in style: Withyham at home, then next week St. Lawrence away, then Lympsfield Chart at home, before facing joint league leaders Underriver. At 2.00 things didn’t look hopeful as rain lashed across the field driven by a stiff breeze, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was the beginning of our chance to end the first half of the season in style: Withyham at home, then next week St. Lawrence away, then Lympsfield Chart at home, before facing joint league leaders Underriver.</p>
<p>At 2.00 things didn’t look hopeful as rain lashed across the field driven by a stiff breeze, and thunder rumbled overhead. Suddenly the wind veered, blue sky appeared from the west and the game was on.</p>
<p>For once, we had a team brimming with youthful bowlers (or, as Nick Pearce was kind enough to put it, in the hearing of our more seasoned servants, ‘good bowlers, for a change’).  Alex and Tom were the first of our good bowlers used, and from the first they had Withyham’s openers twitching like landed fish as they tried to make contact with deliveries whistling into or past them. For a while Withyham stumbled along at around two an over but without loss. It took Ed’s introduction to start the wickets falling, and then they fell quite steadily: Ed and Tom finishing with three apiece, George with two, and Alex and Bob Shapter (spot the odd man out) with one each.</p>
<p>The most significant resistance came from George Smith, who looked as though he should be asked to produce a birth certificate before being allowed to play. He’s about 2’ 6”, probably weighs 3 stone wringing wet (do the conversions yourselves metric boys) and batted impeccably, finishing on 25 not out – a higher score than even extras.</p>
<p>Alex, obviously auditioning for the Firsts, put one catch down and retired, downcast to the boundary.  It was at this point that the crowd closed his book and went for a stroll. In contrast to Alex, Ed seemed quite jolly when he dropped one off his Dad’s bowling, and continued in merry mood when he came out to umpire.</p>
<p>Set a modest 131, but with the wicket and outfield still slow, we made a poor start. Nick Pearce scored off  each of the first two balls, but the third evaded his bat (or did it?), struck his pad, and was taken by the keeper. Standing at the non-striker’s end, er, I mean following up keenly from the non-striker’s end, I have to say that in the flurry of bat and pads I wasn’t sure what had happened, but Nick’s general demeanour as he walked off gave the impression that he had very entrenched views on the subject.</p>
<p>Your correspondent failed to trouble the scorers, beyond recording the means of his dismissal, and Paul Styles only managed a solitary single. At something like 10 – 3 things were not looking good.</p>
<p>Then came the stand that steadied the ship. Captain Nick was joined by Pat Reynolds, and they looked capable of finishing the match on their own until, due to one of those unfortunate incidents when one chap has his ear trumpet tuned to the wrong station and is busy thinking about how his marrows are doing, as the other chap comes hurtling down the pitch yelling, they found themselves sharing the same crease, and hadn’t finished debating who was going to make an effort to reach the other end before the bails were removed. Nick it was who trudged in, after a confident 28 that seems to confirm his return to form.</p>
<p>Young Ed replaced old Nick and struck a lively 27.  With the winning post in sight, first Ed and then ex-captain Brown were lost, but Cool-hand Bob Shapter strode to the crease and dispatched the winning boundary with great insouciance. We won by four wickets with three and a half overs in hand. Pat finished on an unbeaten 52, just failing to avoid the purchase of a jug after spending a suspiciously long time on 49.</p>
<p>At the time of writing it looks as though there is a result for Otford – Lympsfield Chart that has not been returned. Both teams are currently below us (as are Withyham) and will stay that way if their fixture was abandoned or if Lympsfield won. Otford could overtake us if they won.</p>
<p>Next week we play St. Lawrence who are just one point ahead of us, but their total includes 20 points for a conceded fixture. A key game!</p>
<p>Wyn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/06/18/2nd-xi-v-withyham/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday XI v Wadhurst</title>
		<link>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/06/05/sunday-xi-v-wadhurst/</link>
		<comments>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/06/05/sunday-xi-v-wadhurst/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Friendly Match Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/?p=1463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The trophy match between Shoreham CC and The Jolly Rogers is played every yeah with the loser of the match receiving the much coveted &#8216;Dossers Cup&#8217; in memory of Colin Boothroyd. However there was an unusual twist in the match this year where the opposition failed to find eleven cricketers worthy to take on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trophy match between Shoreham CC and The Jolly Rogers is played every yeah with the loser of the match receiving the much coveted &#8216;Dossers Cup&#8217; in memory of Colin Boothroyd. However there was an unusual twist in the match this year where the opposition failed to find eleven cricketers worthy to take on the mighty Shoreham Sunday XI and pulled out on the Thursday before the match. Our Honorary Fixtures Secretary sprung into action to find us a replacement match at Wadhurst CC, a team we had never come across before.</p>
<p>The drive to the ground was a long one with constant rain all the way which didn&#8217;t change much when we finally arrived and much doubt was cast in whether the match would go ahead, especially after Joel told us of a nearby carvery that would serve a mean Sunday roast. But Shoreham cricketers are made of dedicated stuff and decided to stay to see the rain clear up for a slightly delayed start.</p>
<p>After losing the toss, Shoreham were sent into bat on a bouncy and variable wicket. Ray Trick (87) and  Paul Styles (34) made a steady start before picking the pace up with some lovely shots from both batsman. Just when all was going to plan Paul danced down the wicket to a ball from Wagner and but was deceived with the flight and stumped with a nifty bit of keeping. This brought Alex Mazzon to the crease with much expectation of thumping sixes and a guaranteed ton. However he couldn&#8217;t live up to his talk and after an agonisingly slow start, was bowled for 17, but not before seeing Ray hit his 50 and form a 50 partnership with the in-form Trick of the weekend. Cue the Shoreham collapse. After Ray departed, brief spells from Haysler (7), Heathcote (6), George Stacey (4 n.o), Walker (1), Rivett J (very brief) (Golden Duck) and Setterfield (1 n.o) followed bringing the visitors up to a respectable (171-7).</p>
<p>A delightful tea with ridiculously cheap Harveys (£2.50 a pint) followed before Shoreham left for the field with ever darkening skies above. Both openers bowled tightly but couldn&#8217;t find a breakthrough with both Ed (7-2-35-0) and Joel (8-0-29-0) coming very close on a number of occasions. The change came with both Rivett brothers (Jack 4-0-32-0 and George 3-0-18-0) taking the ball but once again no breakthrough could be found there. Jack resorted first to secret weapon Setterfield (6-0-23-0) who tried a new tactic of trying to kill / confuse the batsmen with the odd head high beamer before trying to knock out their middle stump with a devious faster ball. Then came the rain. Out of all other ideas the captain turned to out-of-form Alex Mazzon (Still recovering from injury) to bowl in the downpour. He (6-2-21-0) and Setterfield toiled away with more chances in 8 overs than you usually get in a whole match (Including four dropped catches, one missed stumping and a very close run out) but still the batsmen stood strong. With the scores level their batsmen Notley needed four runs for his century so the ever-gracious Dan Setterfield sportingly bowled a wide to win the game for Wadhurst and leave their batsmen on 96 runs.</p>
<p>The decision was then made that as we had been denied a carvery for lunch, we should get a curry for dinner. Half of the defeated Shoreham cohort then went to Ashique in Sevenoaks for what can only be described as a tour-worthy curry. Even though there was a long drive, torrential downpours and a loss, a good day was had by all and hopefully a regular fixture against a friendly and worthy side.</p>
<p>Mazz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/06/05/sunday-xi-v-wadhurst/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd XI v Cudham Wyse</title>
		<link>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/06/04/2nd-xi-v-cudham-wyse-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/06/04/2nd-xi-v-cudham-wyse-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 10:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2nds Match Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/?p=1460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vaughan Williams ‘The Lark Ascending’ was a fitting accompaniment to my drive through the sunlit summer lanes from Lympsfield Chart to Cudham Wyse. This is one of the most popular pieces in the classical repertoire among British listeners. The use of pentatonic scale patterns frees the violin from a strong tonal centre, and shows the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vaughan Williams ‘The Lark Ascending’ was a fitting accompaniment to my drive through the sunlit summer lanes from Lympsfield Chart to Cudham Wyse. This is one of the most popular pieces in the classical repertoire among British listeners. The use of pentatonic scale patterns frees the violin from a strong tonal centre, and shows the impressionistic side of Vaughan Williams&#8217; style. This liberty also extends to the metre. The cadenzas for solo violin are written without bar lines, lending them a sense of meditational release.</p>
<p>Anyway, it’s pretty good.</p>
<p>I don’t like to make these reviews just about me, but due to a simple error I was absent for the first ten overs of Cudham Wyse’s innings and so I can’t write, first-hand, about anyone else. </p>
<p>Apparently Brad and Bob Shapter made their customary start, keeping the run rate modest but – on this occasion – without making a breakthrough.  </p>
<p>First change were Captain Nick and George Rivett (although the Play Cricket website mistakenly says it was Jack – Boozy please note). Last year George went away a rosy-cheeked, spindly, slow to medium paced, spectacles cleaner. After his round the world tour he has returned a meat-eating, fire-breathing quickie, capable of getting the ball to lift sharply off a length and of bullying even established batsmen.  </p>
<p>Before and after the drinks break, Nick and George took two wickets each: as the scoreboard changed from 75 – 0 to 125 – 4. Cudham Wyse were moving along at 5 an over but at this stage their innings stalled. Some tight bowling, supported by sharp fielding – notably from Josh Westacott, demonstrating his youth on one boundary, and from Nick Pearce, demonstrating his circus skills on the other.</p>
<p>The fall of Cudham Wyse’s sixth wicket at 143 brought Danny Thomas to the crease, and he and Chris Barnes plundered 62 more runs from the last 8 overs, with a combination of bold hitting and quick singles. Before this partnership, a total of 170 – 180 had looked likely but now we had a more formidable 205 to chase.</p>
<p>In a way, our innings began in a similar way to theirs, although it was now the glittering notes of Vivaldi’s violin concerto in B minor that provided a perfect accompaniment to the early evening sunshine, as I made my way back from Lympsfield Chart, carrying the kit that I had inadvertently left there earlier. </p>
<p>I returned to find that Nick Pearce and Pat (aka ‘Stan’) Reynolds were already showered and changed: Nick having contributed an explosive 8 and ‘Stan’ a modest 1. Captain Nick and Martin Wells began to repair the damage with a partnership that lasted several overs (to which Nick contributed 1). It was then Martin, Bob Shapter, and Chris Brown who supplied some substance to our innings. Martin looked in extremely good touch until failing to read an inswinging ball and departing for 34. Bob’s controlled aggression contributed 28 before he fell to an improbable catch at short extra cover when another boundary had seemed odds on. </p>
<p>What is it possible to say about Chris’s innings? He rode his luck as the ball bounced around and over his stumps from a series of Chinese cuts and other, rarer shots that have not yet been categorised and described in Wisden. In between these he top scored with 44 runs to all parts of the ground. </p>
<p>Brad had a golden entry for the duck cup. Russ was bowled just a few runs later, having struck a single boundary. Josh showed distinct promise in his 15 run innings. Ageing Hack (dressed by Walker) was then left undefeated on 9 as a surge of testosterone had Spectacles Cleaner Man swinging wildly over a straight one.</p>
<p>Shoreham were all out in 36.4 overs: 34 runs short of Cudham Wyse’s total and 19 runs short of our next batting point. </p>
<p>Bowling and batting points are proving vital in the bottom half of the Division 5 table.  We are one of four teams with just one win to date. We are 9 points behind Otford, 1 ahead of St. Lawrence, and 5 ahead of Lympsfield Chart. Withyham prop up the table with no wins so far.</p>
<p>We have yet to play the three teams below us so this should give us the opportunity to chalk up some more points. Next week however we play Luddesdown, who top the table, partly as a result of two cancelled fixtures. Fortunately this is a home game, so no feats of memory or navigation are required.</p>
<p>Wyn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/06/04/2nd-xi-v-cudham-wyse-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd XI v Otford</title>
		<link>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/05/21/2nd-xi-v-otford/</link>
		<comments>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/05/21/2nd-xi-v-otford/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 14:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2nds Match Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/?p=1452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In exceptionally difficult fielding conditions, Shoreham beat Otford by 5 wickets with 7 overs to spare. Wyn Wyn, I think that people might appreciate a little more detail. Nick I think that I’ve covered the essentials. Wyn No, really. What about the batting and bowling and that sort of thing? Nick I feel that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In exceptionally difficult fielding conditions, Shoreham beat Otford by 5 wickets with 7 overs to spare.<br />
<em>Wyn</em></p>
<blockquote><p>Wyn, I think that people might appreciate a little more detail.<br />
<em>Nick</em></p></blockquote>
<p>I think that I’ve covered the essentials.<br />
<em>Wyn</em></p>
<blockquote><p>No, really. What about the batting and bowling and that sort of thing?<br />
<em>Nick</em></p></blockquote>
<p>I feel that the defining characteristic of the match, that everyone will want to know about, is just how tricky – in fact nearly impossible – fielding was: what with the uneven ground and the sun reflecting off the windscreens in the car park, and everything.<br />
<em>Wyn</em></p>
<blockquote><p>Everyone else managed.<br />
<em>Nick</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Well what about those Otford batspeople who either dropped the ball just out of range, or else hit it straight at you, very hard?<br />
<em>Wyn</em></p>
<blockquote><p>Oh, just get on with it!<br />
<em>Nick</em></p></blockquote>
<p>No need to take that tone, Mr. Snappy.</p>
<hr />
<p>The afternoon began with the captain addressing the side in the changing room. He suggested that the reason for the previous week’s loss to Halstead was that we had let them score too many runs. A stunned silence followed this penetrating analysis, which put the whole game in a new light for many of us.</p>
<p>Fielding first, in very challenging conditions, we found that Gideon Bishop, Otford’s number two, was in aggressive form, and he plundered 38 runs from our opening attack in very quick order.  Brad finally trapped Bishop lbw, swinging across the line once too often. After that, the score progressed at a more modest rate, but without further loss, into the second half of the innings. At 122 for 1 in the 25th over, Otford seemed destined to post a large score. Then, after Ed was withdrawn from the attack, there was a remarkable turnaround. First, the big Rivett bowled Jonathan Pyman, the Otford captain batting at number three, and only one run later he held on to a catch to dismiss Otford’s other opener off Captain Nick’s bowling. The floodgates then opened.</p>
<p>Nick and Jack broke the back of Otford’s batting. Nick finished with 5 wickets and Jack with 2. The little Rivett then contributed a few tidy overs before Brad returned to polish off the end of a long tail. Monty claimed two catches, Jack, George and Nick one each.  From 122 -1 Otford slumped to 165 all out.</p>
<p>Our bowlers were well supported by some very smart fielding, which was remarkable in the difficult conditions in which anyone might have been forgiven for being deceived by the unpredictable bounce in an uneven outfield. Particularly with the light reflecting off the windscreens in the car park, and .. (The following 200 words have been omitted – ed).</p>
<p>With a fast track, a quick outfield, and a required rate of just over four an over, the scene was set for a Paul Styles innings. At first though, it was Will Westacott who dominated the scoring: racing to his fifty and finally falling for 73 when the openers had completed a century opening stand. Captain Nick was next in but failed to trouble the scorer. Then came Bob Shapter.</p>
<p>It was very noticeable that up to this point virtually all our scoring was either in singles or fours. There had been just two twos. Bob then nearly completed a third – all on his own – before failing to recover his ground as Paul watched benignly, and statically, from the other end.</p>
<p>Monty was fifth in, but was reduced to a spectator as Paul retained the strike, over after over, passing his fifty with a lusty six and a four. Paul was eventually caught at slip, out for 65, with the job all but done.  Ed quickly supplied the 6 further runs required for victory.</p>
<p>So, we posted our first win of the season, and look forward to more: preferably on better tended outfields where fielding … (a further 100 words have been omitted here in the readers’ interest.  – ed).</p>
<p>Wyn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/05/21/2nd-xi-v-otford/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd XI v Underriver</title>
		<link>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/05/07/2nd-xi-v-underriver/</link>
		<comments>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/05/07/2nd-xi-v-underriver/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 09:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2nds Match Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/?p=1439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the second season in a row our first fixture was against league debutantes: last year Luddesdowne, this year Underriver. Of course, one has to be welcoming and so winning would have seemed discourteous. Losing the toss, we were invited to bat. Our batting order was flexible to allow Montie, who was being crowned Queen [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the second season in a row our first fixture was against league debutantes: last year Luddesdowne, this year Underriver. </p>
<p>Of course, one has to be welcoming and so winning would have seemed discourteous.</p>
<p>Losing the toss, we were invited to bat. Our batting order was flexible to allow Montie, who was being crowned Queen Of The May elsewhere, to slot in when he arrived. </p>
<p>Ring rustiness, or possibly the wrong optical prescription, seemed to affect most of the top order. Paul Styles struck a couple of confident boundaries before playing down the wrong line and diverting the ball onto his stumps.  Nick (Captain Hologram) Walker, lasted for just a few, eventful balls. Bob Shapter hung around for a while but also perished cheaply. Wyn attempted to play a steady role but was comprehensively beaten by a good yorker before managing more than a single boundary. </p>
<p>The only man to stand tall was Will Westacott – although let it be said that he is no longer taller than son Josh, who has either been standing in a growbag or was wearing stilts under his whites. First in and fifth out, Will was the only one of the top order to offer us a gleam of hope. Just as he began to flex his muscles and attack the bowling, he was caught on the boundary. Had he survived the story of the game might have been different.</p>
<p>Now came the Sims.</p>
<p>There had been discussion in the close season about whether to play Brad as an all rounder or as an out-and-out paramedic. He proved his worth in the all rounders role: top scoring – only interrupting his innings to save the life of the elderly mother of Underriver’s president, who collapsed on the boundary – and, later, bowling nine economical overs. Meanwhile Bob lent good support, keeping out the bowling at the other end.</p>
<p>By the time that Bob was out the May Queen had arrived, and strode out to bat, long locks flowing in the breeze.  Everyone danced round him for a while, but &#8211; after a promising start – he too fell cheaply. After that, the enthusiastic and promising, but fatally inexperienced, tail of Josh Westacott, Jack Webster, and Zac Beresford contributed only a handful of runs, and Shoreham were all out for 93.</p>
<p>When the opposition were 39 – 4, with Bob Shapter and Brad bowling well, all things seemed possible, but despite our best efforts Underriver lost no more wickets, and overtook us in the 20th over of their innings.</p>
<p>So, welcome to Underriver and better luck to us next time. </p>
<p>- Wyn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/05/07/2nd-xi-v-underriver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acme</title>
		<link>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/04/24/acme-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/04/24/acme-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 14:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Friendly Match Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/?p=1427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A beautiful Easter Sunday greeted a youthful but strong Shoreham side in the age old derby against ACME. The temperature hit a mighty 27ºC, perfect fielding weather you might say? Captain Pat thought so and we were thrust out in the unrelenting sunshine, but with a twist: Both captains agreed that both sides would have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A beautiful Easter Sunday greeted a youthful but strong Shoreham side in the age old derby against ACME. The temperature hit a mighty 27ºC, perfect fielding weather you might say? Captain Pat thought so and we were thrust out in the unrelenting sunshine, but with a twist: Both captains agreed that both sides would have to use 9 bowlers to make the match a bit more exciting.</p>
<p>Both opening bowlers toiled away  with Sean Bromfield (9 – 2 – 41 – 0) and Ed Walker (8 – 1 – 50 – 1) coming close on a number of occasions but the openers stood strong through to the first change. Rivett J (4 – 0 – 13 – 0) and Haysler (1 – 0 – 21 – 0) continued the bowling attack but alas, no breakthrough could be found there, although they seemed to take a liking to Alex&#8217;s legspin and he was dispatched for an expensive 21 run over. The first wicket came finally when Lynch  was decieved by a corker from players&#8217; player Danny Setterfield (6 – 0 – 37 – 1) which went down a treat until from the huddle, Pat realised who the next batsman was. Fresh off a casual 160 the week before, Siva (75 n.o) took to the crease. The run rate picked up from there on until Shoreham released their secret weapon. Rivett G (4 – 2 – 7 – 2) dented the ACME plans a tad by first of all dismissing Marshall, but then proceeding to trap Williamson LBW for nothing less than a golden duck. The hat-trick ball was bowled with every fielder as close as they could get but unfortunately was defended expertly, leaving George with nothing less than a double wicket maiden. Siva very nearly fell by looping one to George on the boundary but it was not to be; he confessed to be sitting on the line as he made the catch and Siva was awarded another six. Brownie (1 – 0 – 11 – 0) and G. Stacey (1 – 0 – 14 – 0) also joined the party but couldn&#8217;t make a breakthrough in the strong batting line-up. The innings ended on 249 – 4 setting Shoreham a nice round 250 for the win.</p>
<p>After a wonderful ACME tea it was Shoreham&#8217;s turn to bat with Haysler (46) and Nick Walker (11). The Boakes Meadow Massive pair put on 34 before the first wicket fell when Siva was brought on to bowl and Nick was trapped LBW. This brought Bromfield to the crease for his first batting display of the season. He didn&#8217;t disappoint either with a tidy 42, unfazed by a few roaring appeals from &#8216;the Growler&#8217; Prest, until he set off for a run that never was and was well fielded by Masterson S. Mazzon came in just in time to see Haysler lose his offstump to another Siva corker and a 62 run partnership for the High Street Massive then formed between Brownie (13) and Mazzon (31) (including a handy 6 and 18 extras). But it was not enough and the overs ran out with just 192 on the board. A special mention should go to Mr Extras who gave us a helping hand with an innings high 46 runs and George for throwing himself around in the field to try and slow the run rate. So the cricket was over for another week and the Sunday XI were back into the swing of things with a losing draw.</p>
<p>Mazz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2011/04/24/acme-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Tendulkar to Trick</title>
		<link>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2010/11/03/from-tendulkar-to-trick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2010/11/03/from-tendulkar-to-trick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/?p=1413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At this year&#8217;s Presentation Dinner, 1st XI skipper James Trick scooped awards for the Outstanding Batsman, 1st XI players&#8217; player and for the season&#8217;s outstanding 1st XI performance. The picture shows James receiving the Outstanding Batsman award from Club Chairman Martin Wells. Uniquely the award is a bat which was endorsed by Indian Cricket legend [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/tendulkar2.jpg" alt="Simon and Sachin" title="tendulkar2" width="500" height="332" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1416" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/tendulkar1.jpg" alt="Martin and James" title="tendulkar1" width="500" height="375" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1415" /></p>
<p>At this year&#8217;s Presentation Dinner, 1st XI skipper James Trick scooped awards for the Outstanding Batsman, 1st XI players&#8217; player and for the season&#8217;s outstanding 1st XI performance. The picture shows James receiving the Outstanding Batsman award from Club Chairman Martin Wells. Uniquely the award is a bat which was endorsed by Indian Cricket legend Sachin Tendulkar when Sachin visited the office of Martin&#8217;s son Simon, who works in Mumbai. Gary Hukins won the top bowler award and Pat Barrett was Clubman of the year. Nick Walker, Will Stanyard, Dan Setterfield, Alex Mazzon and Tom Palmer also were awarded trophies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2010/11/03/from-tendulkar-to-trick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raid stopped play during rivals&#8217; clash</title>
		<link>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2010/09/20/raid-stopped-play-during-rivals-clash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2010/09/20/raid-stopped-play-during-rivals-clash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/?p=1387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Salute to the few&#8217; by Geoff Nutkins Shoreham boasts one of the loveliest cricket grounds in the district. Set among trees in the Darenth Valley, on the edge of the golf course and about a mile from the village centre, it has seen many stirring games against fellow members of the village cricket league. One [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/spitfire.jpg" alt="" title="spitfire" width="450" height="293" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1388" /><br />
&#8216;Salute to the few&#8217; by <a href="http://www.aviartnutkins.com/open_editions/AA10_Salute_to_the_Few.php">Geoff Nutkins</a></p>
<p>Shoreham boasts one of the loveliest cricket grounds in the district.</p>
<p>Set among trees in the Darenth Valley, on the edge of the golf course and about a mile from the village centre, it has seen many stirring games against fellow members of the village cricket league.</p>
<p>One stand-out fixture is against neighbouring Farningham when members of both teams pray that this annual and long-standing clash will not be affected by rain.</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t rain that worried the cricketers on August 24, 1940.</p>
<p>The Battle of Britain was in full swing and this area of Kent with its proximity to the &#8216;dummy&#8217; airfield at Lullingstone and Biggin Hill airfield was already getting a reputation as the most targeted area in the country; in fact Shoreham was later to be known as &#8216;bomb alley&#8217;.</p>
<p>John Drew, the son of one of those 1940 cricketers, has been looking closely into the extraordinary circumstances behind this 1940 cricket match – how Shoreham were thirsting for revenge from the unexpected defeat three weeks earlier by Farningham, and how the weather was bright and clear.</p>
<p>He writes: &#8220;The distinctive memorial cross incised in chalk on the hill had been blacked out with bracken but the players wore white so they would have been clearly seen by any raider that came this way.</p>
<p>&#8220;There was a full fixture list for 1940 though some old rivals were unable to field teams and special permits were required both for petrol, presumably to mow their sloping hillside ground on the Mildmay estate, to transport them to away games, and for margarine and sugar for the cricket teas.</p>
<p>&#8220;Farningham was less lucky. Its ground was rented from the farm and shared with cows.</p>
<p>&#8220;With the outbreak of war, the farm land was needed and the wicket was dug up to be used as an emplacement for a barrage balloon.</p>
<p>&#8220;Both teams had their own cricketing families.</p>
<p>&#8220;Farningham had the Mills brothers. Shoreham could call on four Dinnis brothers at any one time and Jack Summerfield, fast bowler and big hitter, was one of four generations to play for the village as well as keep the George, the ancient inn that commands the entrance to the village.</p>
<p>&#8220;The match on August 3 had provided a memorable victory for Farningham, and Shoreham were determined not to allow a home win slip through their fingers a second time.</p>
<p>&#8220;In the interval between the two matches, the war had become more of a reality. German aircraft were beginning to make daylight raids, not just on coastal towns but further inland.</p>
<p>&#8220;Only the previous Sunday, a Hurricane from the fighter base at Biggin Hill had been forced to make a crash landing near Sepham Farm.</p>
<p>&#8220;Farningham had only just recovered from its own nasty war scare: the church bells had rung late one afternoon to announce the German invasion had begun.</p>
<p>&#8220;It was a false alarm, what were thought to be German paratroops landing turned out to be ack-ack smoke over the Medway, and the vicar, Freddie Wiltshire, was severely reprimanded for ordering the bells to be rung.</p>
<p>&#8220;This was not before several residents had shut themselves up in their houses.&#8221;</p>
<p>John Drew tells me that he was on the boundary as a baby in a pram on August 24 when the second match between Shoreham and Farningham took place.</p>
<p>He doesn&#8217;t remember any of the details but the old scorebook tells him that Farningham, one short, batted first.</p>
<p>He writes: &#8220;In its sports columns, the local paper reported laconically that &#8220;owing to circumstances&#8221; Farningham were forced to declare at 80 for six (Gordon Wood, retired 11, Bruce Couchman 20, Bill Mills 23, my father Bernard Drew left not out on 5).</p>
<p>&#8220;Shoreham, with Harry Saker&#8217;s 39 proving decisive, passed the Farningham total with just three wickets down. Carrying on to give everyone who wanted a chance to bat (the custom in those days), they scored 106 for 9.</p>
<p>&#8220;My father took the last Shoreham wicket (one of two, one caught and bowled, plus another catch, all too late to be of use but still a good day for him).</p>
<p>What were the untold &#8216;circumstances&#8217; that led Farningham to make such a reckless declaration?</p>
<p>The answer is provided by an (anonymous) news piece in the local paper that was clearly written by my father (in spite of all names, including those of the villages, being censored).</p>
<p>It is published under the heading: &#8220;Raid Stopped Play&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Farningham batsmen had just settled in to their innings when one of the umpires became restive, looking at the hilltop horizon rather than down the wicket.</p>
<p>&#8220;It was he who first sensed that &#8216;Jerry&#8217; was about, although so intent was their concentration on the game that no-one could recall hearing any warning air-raid siren. After an over in which a series of increasingly loud thumps, bumps and bangs were heard, play was suspended while everyone stopped to watch a terrific aerial battle going on some way to the north.</p>
<p>&#8220;The players did eventually drift back towards the pavilion but at least one elderly spectator, when it was suggested he join them, refused to leave his shady spot on the boundary.</p>
<p>&#8220;Though Shoreham and Farningham weren&#8217;t to know it when they arranged their fixture, August 24, being fine and clear, was a perfect day for the German air force to step up their efforts to win the Battle of Britain.</p>
<p>&#8220;At 15.00 hours, just after Farningham had gone in to bat, the Luftwaffe began a massive raid on East London.</p>
<p>&#8220;The RAF were stretched to capacity, squadrons of Hurricanes and Spitfires from the nearby Biggin Hill base being scrambled all day to engage the enemy.</p>
<p>&#8220;Although the centre of the action in the afternoon was some miles away on the Essex side of the Thames, looking north towards Farningham from the Shoreham ground, it might have seemed that all hell was breaking loose over Farningham itself.&#8221;</p>
<p>John goes on to say that when the match resumed Farningham had to declare because they were now four short.</p>
<p>The men hadn&#8217;t run away because of the action overhead but had reported for duty in the Home Guard.</p>
<p>&#8220;During the stoppage caused by the raid there may well have been some discussion about the wisdom of continuing at all while battles went on overhead.</p>
<p>&#8220;Fighters scrambling hill-top high out of Biggin Hill must have been unnerving enough.</p>
<p>&#8220;Dog-fights, anti-aircraft and machine-gun fire, shell-bursts, shrapnel, even though further away, rather more so.</p>
<p>&#8220;The scorebook shows several changes of handwriting and betrays in its gaps and slippages some degree of uncertainty.</p>
<p>&#8220;Unusually, four of the Shoreham regulars who had been selected did not actually play and it may be that they had wisely taken evasive action in advance – though two of the Dinnis brothers almost certainly had to give priority to war-related work on the farm, the bumper harvest and the hop-picking.</p>
<p>&#8220;Other Shoreham players were ready to hand. Farningham, away from home, were quite literally caught at sixes and sevens and were simply outnumbered.</p>
<p>&#8220;My father had no doubt that the German raid had robbed Farningham of a fair chance of completing what would have been a unique &#8216;away&#8217; double over Shoreham.</p>
<p>&#8220;At the end of an extraordinary day of cricket, my father commented that, from Farningham&#8217;s point of view, Hitler had a lot to answer for.&#8221;</p>
<p>I thank John Drew for the story of this last village wartime cricket match to be played on Lord Mildmay&#8217;s lovely ground, until one week before VE Day.</p>
<p>John says that Farningham&#8217;s ground was in such a state that it could not be restored until 1947, largely due to Gordon Wood.</p>
<p>He writes: &#8220;When play resumed after the war both teams were men short, among them Edwin Bowen who, bowling for Shoreham as a 17-year-old took the crucial wicket of big hitter Bruce Couchman on August 24. Edwin had been killed flying in a bombing raid over Germany.&#8221;</p>
<p>Written by John Drew<br />
Edited by Bob Ogley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shorehamcc.co.uk/2010/09/20/raid-stopped-play-during-rivals-clash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

